Rated 3.4 out of 5 by 38
Rated 3.0 out of 5.0 by michmic Looks nice, too expensive for the quality, difficult to install
These look nice on my windows, but the hardware is cheap and they are very difficult to install without an extra person. (I have installed a lot of window treatments by myself over the last 25 years) I don't think the brackets will stand up to constant use.
They are not worth what I paid for them, but for someone who has the need for a Roman Shade and has help from someone to install them and is willing to pay more than they are worth, then I would say go ahead and buy them.
October 4, 2016
Rated 4.0 out of 5.0 by pjandpb Perfect Shade for Bathroom
I had a difficullt time finding a window treatment for a small bathroom window which is directly across from the shower. This roman shade is perfect. It's classy enough to look updated for our newly remodeled bathroom and yet it gives us the privacy we need when someone is in the shower. It's lined and looks good from outside as well. The price for a small window was considerably more than I wanted to spend, but after installing it we felt it looked good enough to warrant the money spent. I'm very pleased and would recommend it.
January 27, 2015
Rated 1.0 out of 5.0 by Jaw007 Out of Square, no insulating thermal properties
We ordered one for a sample to see what the fabric is, what it looks like, and how it hangs with our windows. We plan to order for all the windows in the house. The Shade we received, when hanging, is out of square with the window. The plastic head piece was sewn, and riveted in at 1/4" out of square with the shade sides. It makes the shade hang at a diagonal in the window about 1 1/2" out of plumb with the sides. There is no adjustment to fix it because of the rivets. Will have to return to the store because the warranty information lacks contact information to get any help. The shade looks and functions OK for the price. The fabric is a white, vinyl/rubber type of material on the back, and appears to be linen type facing all made in one piece, like outdoor furniture fabric of some sort. Not sure why it is called a "thermal" blackout, because the thermal properties of a piece of vinyl/rubber are less than any cloth fabric material might be. So "thermal" in the product name is misleading. The blackout properties are good. The only light is from holes in the stitching, and along the edges where it does not meet the window.
We will see how the replacement goes, and may revise this review if all goes well. The price is great for a Roman type of blind. just wish it was built with a bit more quality control in the manufacturing process.
April 20, 2016
Rated 5.0 out of 5.0 by dwcsjbcjthmo For the price, very good purchase.
I am pleased with the look and function of these shades. Considering the price of these shades, they look nice and were easy to install. I did not want to go to the cost of custom made and these shades did the job.
August 16, 2016
Rated 5.0 out of 5.0 by Ellieo Great light blocking shade
Beautiful, well made light blocking shade. Went up easily, works well.
August 7, 2016
Rated 5.0 out of 5.0 by home8 Awesome product!
I am VERY pleased with this product! The "linen look" completely blocks the sun. I'm so glad I made this purchase for my front door.
June 24, 2016
Rated 2.0 out of 5.0 by sea226 Material doesn't last long
I really liked the look of this shade when I installed it last November. However, I already have tears in the fabric where the pull-loops intersect with the shade's folds. It's too bad this didn't last me long under normal daily use.
June 10, 2015
Rated 1.0 out of 5.0 by Thenewhouse Just say no
Bought these for master bedroom and bath; 7 Windows. Pain to install and must remain vigilant so one end doesn't fall when opening or closing. After 6 months, cracks appeared in shade at places where cord attaches to back of shade. At 16 months small splits are now full slits on folds and connections.
Very nice looking. Work ok but not great as blackout shades. Absolutely fail as any kind of expected lifetime. Very expensive mistake.
April 14, 2016